Provincial newspaper dodges penalty for using ‘extremist’ visuals
The prosecutor’s office acknowledged that Lepelski Krai had distributed “extremist” materials. Still, the editorial staff was not punished, unlike non-state publications, which are usually fined.
Reader spots watermarked photos from ‘extremist’ news outlet
Vitsebsk activist Dzmitry Karneyenka filed a complaint with the Lepel District Prosecutor’s Office, pointing out that the website of the regional newspaper uses photos with the inscription “TUT.BY”, which can be considered “distribution of extremist content”. He pointed out five such cases and asked the prosecutor to evaluate the publications and bring the violators to justice.
Prosecutor confirms law violations, but no one held accountable
Dzmitry Karneyenka received a reply from the Lepel District Prosecutor’s Office. Prosecutor Vital Zhyhimont said that editor Yana Misnik was ordered to eliminate violations of legislation on countering extremism, and access to the archived version of the site was closed.
The employee responsible for the site was fired before the incident, so it is impossible to bring her to disciplinary responsibility. The complaint was referred to the Lepel District Internal Affairs Department to consider the issue of holding them administratively liable.
Last year, the newspaper was purged: the former editor of the Lepel newspaper, Sviatlana Vozniak, and several employees were dismissed for failing to meet ideological requirements.
Non-state publications face harsh penalties for similar ‘mistakes’
For example, in 2021, Aliaksei Shota, the director and editor-in-chief of the news outlet Hrodna.Life, was fined $4,430 for publishing materials linked to an extremist Telegram channel, even though the channel was not designated as extremist at the time of publication. He also failed to appeal the decision and receive an installment of the fine.
On June 3, 2021, Iryna Novik, the publication’s special projects editor, was fined $286 and spent three days in detention awaiting trial.