• Actual
  • Law and the media
  • Helpful
  • Work areas and campaigns
  • Reviews and monitoring
  • Human rights groups to U.N. Special Rapporteur on Belarus: it’s time to stop internet shutdowns, website blocking, anti-extremism laws

    On February 19, Access Now, Agora, Article 19, Human Constanta, International Media Support and Internet Protection Society raised serious concerns about the escalating human rights situation in Belarus, submitting detailed information to Anaïs Marin, U.N. Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus. The groups focused on internet shutdowns and website blocking, and the use of anti-extremism laws against civil society and the opposition — both of which are being initiated by authorities in the context of a larger endeavor to stifle freedom of expression and peaceful assembly in Belarus. 

    “Inter­net free­dom abus­es high­light­ed in this sub­mis­sion are an arm in the sophis­ti­cat­ed machin­ery built by the author­i­ties through­out the years of Lukashenko’s rule to muz­zle peace­ful dis­sent,” said Gul­nara Akhun­do­va, Head of Glob­al Response Depart­ment at Inter­na­tion­al Media Sup­port. “In char­ac­ter with the phys­i­cal bru­tal­i­ty dis­played against pro­test­ers in recent months, this assault on the dig­i­tal rights of Belaru­sians is undoubt­ed­ly a part of the grand scheme to silence their crit­i­cal voice.” 

    The joint sub­mis­sion to the Spe­cial Rap­por­teur is part of exten­sive advo­ca­cy efforts to expose and con­demn the ongo­ing human rights abus­es active­ly per­pe­trat­ed by the Belaru­sian author­i­ties, 194 days since the August 9, 2020 elec­tions — a dark day for democ­ra­cy that has been deemed nei­ther free nor fair by mul­ti­ple actors.

    While nation­al laws and judi­cia­ry have proved their inef­fec­tive­ness in main­tain­ing jus­tice in Belarus, we are rely­ing on inter­na­tion­al law and the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty,” said Alex­ey Kozliuk, a co-founder of Human Con­stan­ta. “We reit­er­ate that pri­vate IT-com­pa­nies also have human rights respon­si­bil­i­ties and uneth­i­cal busi­ness prac­tices should not be tol­er­at­ed.”

    “Author­i­ties in Belarus have a blue­print in place to sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly deny peo­ple their rights to free expres­sion and assem­bly, and access to infor­ma­tion,” said Natalia Krapi­va, Tech Legal Coun­sel at Access Now. “The gov­ern­ment of Belarus, tech com­pa­nies, and oth­er Mem­ber States all have a role to play in rein­stat­ing and uphold­ing fun­da­men­tal rights. Today, we’ve laid out these mea­sures for the U.N. Spe­cial Rap­por­teur.”

    The sub­mis­sion includes six tai­lored rec­om­men­da­tions for the Spe­cial Rapporteur’s con­sid­er­a­tion, specif­i­cal­ly request­ing the Belaru­sian author­i­ties, tech com­pa­nies oper­at­ing in the coun­try, and oth­er Mem­ber States to take the fol­low­ing actions:

    Belaru­sian Author­i­ties 

    1. Imme­di­ate­ly stop and refrain from all future inter­fer­ence with the access to the inter­net, includ­ing mobile inter­net and spe­cif­ic web­sites, and pro­vide infor­ma­tion con­cern­ing the orders and imple­men­ta­tion of inter­net shut­downs; and

    2. Bring nation­al laws and their enforce­ment in com­pli­ance with inter­na­tion­al stan­dards in order to pre­vent arbi­trary lim­i­ta­tions on the rights to free­dom of expres­sion, peace­ful assem­bly and asso­ci­a­tion, and revoke “anti-extrem­ism” laws in their cur­rent form.

    Tech­nol­o­gy com­pa­nies

    1. Imme­di­ate­ly stop facil­i­tat­ing inter­net shut­downs and cen­sor­ship in Belarus and com­ply with UNGP and OECD Guide­lines, includ­ing through con­test­ing the legal­i­ty of gov­ern­ment orders, pre­serv­ing and pro­vid­ing evi­dence, and pro­vid­ing effec­tive reme­dies for past dis­rup­tions; and

    2. Join civ­il soci­ety and peer com­pa­nies to push back against gov­ern­ment cen­sor­ship and repres­sion.

    Oth­er Mem­ber States

    1. Imme­di­ate­ly stop pro­vid­ing cen­sor­ship tech­nolo­gies to the Belaru­sian gov­ern­ment; and

    2. Ensure that com­pa­nies in their juris­dic­tions that facil­i­tate and aid cen­sor­ship, shut­downs, and oth­er abus­es abroad are held account­able.  

    The sub­mis­sion builds on pre­vi­ous advo­ca­cy out­puts, includ­ing the Urgent appeal con­cern­ing inter­net ser­vice dis­rup­tions in Belarus in the con­textof the pres­i­den­tial elec­tions of 9 August 2020 to U.N. Spe­cial Rap­por­teurs, and the Novem­ber, 2020 Sub­mis­sion pur­suant to Human Rights Coun­cil res­o­lu­tion 45/1 to the U.N. Spe­cial Rap­por­teur on the sit­u­a­tion of human rights in Belarus.

    The most important news and materials in our Telegram channel — subscribe!
    @bajmedia
    Most read
    Every day send to your mailbox: actual offers (grants, vacancies, competitions, scholarships), announcements of events (lectures, performances, presentations, press conferences) and good content.

    Subscribe

    * indicates required

    By subscribing to the newsletter, you agree to the Privacy Policy